Review breaks rules 1 and 2

[cheesestix]

At http://ratemyserver.net/index.php?page=serverstat&serid=1757&itv=6&url_sname=EuphRO&page_num=1, the user "Kineas" posted this:

Euphro Used to be one of the best servers out there in the Low rate category, but the Owner Is a Power Hungry Kid that is Corrupted and Likes to abuse his power on people.The Community Is So Stuck up you will regret even coming here,I was once in it for a long time till it just got corrupted.

I believe that saying our server is bad because it is "corrupt" was shown in the example of rule 1) as a no-no. Notice that he doesn't say much about what actually makes our community and owner "corrupt". And, the fact that he calls everyone corrupt is a fairly good indicator that he is probably doing this review out of spite, especially since he supposedly quit months ago (at least according to him), which would make writing a review now rather inaccurate.

There is also the personal attack on the owner of the server, which is in violation of rule 2).

Thank you for your time.

[yC]

If I am not mistaken he said "[the Owner] Likes to abuse his power on people" which makes the server corrupted in his eyes. 

"Abuse power" / "Power Hungry" / "Kid" are not a personal attack, it's a complain on the behavior of the team.  Aren't personal attacks are like "he's gay", "he likes man" etc?

Anyway, it's below 70 you can simply reply to the review.