Again there is no proof CONCLUSIVE proof Cookie=Yata.
This thread was not intended to directly attack Yata. It does not matter if he is Cookie or not. This cannot be proven.
However, the evidence at hand does prove Cookie to be guilty of several unethical acts.
Please read.
2. If you were at the Sanctity RO forums then most likely you were going to be a player, no? So why would you try and destroy a server that is not even open yet and for the rest of us? Some of us were hoping for a fresh new start and with that population many of us were happy to have a geared up WoE server. But what if you were not interested in the server? Say maybe an angry GM who is throwing a tantrum about the WoE population from leaving their server? Seems to make sense. Why would a random player waste their time in destroying a server for players? What do they have to gain? Revenge seems likely to be the motive here. Additionally why would you even be scared about a DDOS if Cookie is Yata and had access to your IP? What would he DDOS your router? Lmao I'm sorry but this is a bit ridiculous on that one. Unless you are referring to your server which may have been DDOS'd considering you might be Ancient.
So if a server prospers at the cost of another (DDOS). That makes it ethical? I haven't played both servers. However, I have friends that played Evolve and friends that are about to play sRO. My intentions ? I don't want to see them being bullied around. I have been DDOS'ed in the past and I can tell assure you it isn't pleasant. I already stated that I will reveal myself. When that happens, you will see I am by no means related to Ancient. There is no concrete evidence that I am Ancient. There is concrete evidence of Cookie admitting DDOS'ing.
3. The main point in this thread was about how Cookie DDOS'd Evolve is it not? Regardless IF he is the admin of Sanctity or not is irrelevant. You are basing your whole argument and accusation on a DDOS which MAY (I won't say no as it could be possible from playing both in my experience) have happened. However from your words you make it act like you are scared of being DDOS'd. So question: Why would a player of their own accord who claims to not be involved in this at all suddenly come to post this topic to defend Evolve and attack Cookie? How did you even acquire this video when Ancient also had access to it? What are you trying to prove? That Cookie is corrupt/maybe a sociopath? We already know this. Anyone with a brain can check out his history on RMS or the banner on his signature. To me it seems way too much of a coincidence for these events to occur let alone Ancient HAVING those facebook links to it and so on. Like I said you either ARE Ancient (most likely) or some tool being used by him. Who else would have such a motive? We've all been here the past few months and seen the Cookie/Ancient/Helios drama. We're not idiots. Plus again I'm no internet genius, but pretty sure the whole point of proxies are to COVER UP your IP address.
I mentioned that I have access to this, because a link was available in the sRO shoutbox. Any person can download youtube movies. I am simply providing stronger evidence, strong enough to delist his servers, i.e. DivinityRO and EO.
Lastly the thing that pissed me off the most regardless of who you are is that you posted a video to public forum of someone without their consent. Respect people's privacy and rights. I don't care if you and Cookie and whoever the hell is involved here, its pathetic to do this and invade someone's privacy no matter whose it is. Even if its an ape like Cookie, they still do not deserve that. And Ancient has practically hit the same tier as Cookie already for me with his poor choices, corruption, playing along with this drama and even posting those FB links to Cookie's personal information (for those of us that saw it). I trust an Admin as a player with my personal information and for someone to go and do that is the tip of the iceberg for me. I'm done with Evolve for good now and I think that's why everyone is quitting because we've all lost our trust and were hoping for a fresh start on Sanctity.
There are times when people's privacy are indeed violated. When is this? When a cop comes at your door, saying I would like to investigate your home. You can tell him to leave. However, once he comes back with a search warrant, he is allowed to search the home. How is this justified? Possible unethical behavior should be investigated. If not we could all just steal anything, run into our homes and hide. And if someone does provide clear evidence, we can just say "violation of privacy" right.... I am not a cop, but I justified the grey area that way. That aside, we shouldn't stray much further from the topic at hand.
I am doing this, because Cookie has bullied people in the past, but he has never been punished accordingly. He admits corruption and shows no sign of remorse in the video. On top of that he even brags about DDOS'ing another server. He is intentionally involved in unethical activities? Yet you overlook these things because "you" want a fresh start.
I have a video, solid proof. Where is your evidence for defending Cookie?
