RMS Home | Guide Writing | Test Server | New Servers | Latest Reviews

Author Topic: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick  (Read 2225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TS

[Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« on: Sep 02, 2011, 12:32 am »
La'cryma Stick [2]   [One Hand]   Item ID# 1646 (La'cryma_Stick)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Description]
Decorated with animal tails, it symbolizes a staff frequently used by a great magician.
Strengthens the ice element magic, Storm Gust.
MATK + 15%, INT + 4
Each refine increases MDEF + 1 and damage with Storm Gust by 1%.
If refined to + 10, reduce Storm Gust cast time by 8%.

[Item Script]
{ bonus bInt,4; bonus bMatkRate,15; bonus bMDef,1; bonus2 bSkillAtk,"WZ_STORMGUST",getrefine(); if (getrefine() > 9) bonus2 bCastRate,"WZ_STORMGUST",-8; },{},{}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the script is "bonus bMDef,1", it always gives +1 to MDEF which means it completely ignores the refinement level.
From how it's described (Each refine increases MDEF + 1), I believe bonus bMDef,1 should be bonus bMDef,getrefine().

RateMyServer Ragnarok Community

[Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« on: Sep 02, 2011, 12:32 am »

Offline weeaboo

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #1 on: Sep 02, 2011, 06:35 am »
The description might be what's wrong, though.

Offline TS

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #2 on: Sep 02, 2011, 09:35 am »
Thanks for pointing that out.  I googled and found these websites.

[MDEF + 1]
http://rune-nifelheim.com/item/1646/
http://ghostro.org/?module=item&action=view&id=1646

[MDEF + getrefine()]
http://www.fusionro.com/?module=item&action=view&id=1646
http://www.prontera.in.th/forums/index.php?showtopic=21916

It seems there are both cases.  But I still see the mismatch of the description [MDEF + getrefine()] and the script[MDEF + 1], and I just want them to be consistent, one way or the other.


If the description will be fixed,

----- Copy from here -----
Decorated with animal tails, it symbolizes a staff frequently used by a great magician.
Strengthens the ice element magic, Storm Gust.
MATK + 15%, INT + 4, MDEF + 1.
Each refine increases damage with Storm Gust by 1%.
If refined to + 10, reduce Storm Gust cast time by 8%.
----- Copy until here -----


If the script will be fixed,

----- Copy from here -----
{ bonus bInt,4; bonus bMatkRate,15; bonus bMDef,getrefine(); bonus2 bSkillAtk,"WZ_STORMGUST",getrefine(); if (getrefine() > 9) bonus2 bCastRate,"WZ_STORMGUST",-8; },{},{}
----- Copy until here -----


Either correction would be appreciated.

Offline Xantara

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #3 on: Sep 02, 2011, 01:55 pm »
I would go with iRO Wiki's database since it should be official: http://db.irowiki.org/db/item-info/1646/

Quote
A highclass mage's staff decorated with rich tail-feathers. It has been especially treated for the ice elemental magical spell, 'Stormgust'.

    For each upgrade:
        MDef +1
        Each upgrade increases the damage inflicted with [Storm Gust] by 1%.
    If upgraded to +10:
        Reduces the variable cast time for [Storm Gust] by 8%.

Thus your first post is correct.

Offline yC

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #4 on: Sep 03, 2011, 01:30 am »
I'd go with the description too but for servers that are using eA they are of course going by the script.  I reported it.  See if there is a quick action to change the script then I'll make the change on RMS. 

Offline TS

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #5 on: Sep 03, 2011, 01:12 pm »
Thanks for your action, yC.

Offline yC

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #6 on: Sep 08, 2011, 05:05 pm »

Offline TS

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #7 on: Sep 11, 2011, 11:15 pm »
Thanks for the update.  Hoping to get the attention soon.

Offline yC

Re: [Incorrect Script] La'cryma Stick
« Reply #8 on: Nov 08, 2011, 09:03 am »
It seems the report wont be looked into for a while, I just went and put a warning on the description saying the quoted effect might not be implemented.