YmirRO

[Furious]

Part of me respects your review

the other part of me is laughing really hard because your server, when you made it, had worse flaws than the ones you mentioned.

What flaws? Even if it had worse flaws, it didn't get any bad reviews.

Anyway, you're going off topic. Think before you post, please.

[Omi]

lets see...

woe enabled from very beginning, one guild had all castles first week, woe SE with 5 players, low player count, no economy, dungeon level warper on a low rate, died within first month..

the reason you got no bad reviews cause there wasn't any players to review

[Furious]

lets see...

woe enabled from very beginning, one guild had all castles first week, woe SE with 5 players, low player count, no economy, dungeon level warper on a low rate, died within first month..

the reason you got no bad reviews cause there wasn't any players to review

Uh, we made treasure chests not spawn. We DIDNT have a dungeon level warper, I don't know what you're saying. I think you're seriously getting confused. Also, if you had checked our RMS listing, our average was 90/100. Basically you are saying a server with a small population is flawed? Then you're saying that hundreds out there are flawed. Population doesn't make a server, I seen a lot of BIG servers which are way more flawed than my old server, and YmirRO.

We had few players which means poor economy, duh. It didn't die btw, the players agreed that we should restart it fresh. We now have a server with a much larger population and growing.


Also, please remember, I didn't complain about the population size at all on my review. I myself prefer a population of quality players than a population of mindless idiots.

[Green]

I don't see a clause on the review subforum saying that you can only review a server if you have made a server that is better.

Everyone has their preferences on what they want in a server. <<

[devilsnevercry]

lol sorry anyone that has to give rewards for what sin the pic is kinda sad.

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e242/damarus666/lolwut.jpg

I think the server is crap I do use the folder i installed it in for another RO server n_n; its good for something.

[Tigress]

Quick statement of known fact from the one and only Tigress, (one of the longest staying player on the server):
1) I assume "dominant guild" is referring to LIGHT.
   Basically LIGHT became dominant only after 2weeks joining the server. Unlike what is said in the review.
 
2) LIGHT doesn't have godly gears. LIGHT which is the 2nd youngest guild on the server has ZERO MVP CARDS, and 3 MINI-BOSS CARDS. (only one being ghostring).  Some of them even have +4 woe equipments ~.~.
   
3) The older guilds on the server have the awesome gears. Some gears i know exist on the server are : +9 tidal, +9 shoes, GTB card, at least one more GR card somewhere, Ice picks, Combat Knife, Ocean Armor[1], a Valk set.

4) The youngest guild on the server Redemption need more lvls, and the basic woe gears. There is no point complaining about someone having a GR card if a guild doesn't have the lvl95+ trans chars, and basic equips such as Wool/Tidal/Raydric/Noxious/Matyr/GreenFerus/PvP Gear/featherBeret.
END.


CONTINUE
About lvling : in my experience on Ymir-RO ONLY takes a week to lvl a char to lvl95 trans on 10x rate. After that, you can hunt your gears, and within 2~3 weeks, you can get an entire guild geared for woe. This is exactly what LIGHT did when they joined the server... so I don't see whats the point of complaining about lvl 99 trans characters.
An example: I happened to have been interested in a 7x server which just opened for 1 week. I looked up their control panel.. and although 1 week old it already has 5~7 players with lvl 97+ trans.
END.

I promised I wouldn't read, nor reply here again. I saw how many replies were made in just a day, and decided that I have to check what people are saying.

I know a lot of people who are able to get to lvl99 in 2 days on a x10 server and trans in about 5 days. I don't know what server you're talking about with x7 rates and already 5~7 lvl97+ trans in 2 weeks, but I imo its not hat unbelievable. All it takes is a few hardcore RO players who know the best places to level up in the shortest amount of time. You said it was newly opened, well thats the reason why. People on a newly opened server will play for MANY hours straight to get to trans the first.

Also, who said I said Light was the 'dominant' guild? I said there was a guild which was there from way back, and have near godly eq and mvp card. It looks like you guys are calling yourself dominant. Which then proves my point that there IS a dominant guild.

Anway, it's funny how players feel so attacked by a review. I have nothing against YmirRO, in my opinion I wouldn't play it again. If anyone wants to start playing the server to prove me wrong, please do so. I wish all the players of YmirRO the best of luck and I hope your server grows, despite the obvious flaws.

I WAS STATING FACTS. U CAN'T ARGUE WITH FACTS.
if u are not talking about LIGHT, then this review is definitely not from a current player of the server.
CONCLUSION: THIS IS A FAKE REVIEW!! he doesn't even know what is going on in the server.

[SilverStream~]

No the review isn't fake Tigress, get off your horse.

More importantly, they should be de-listed for offering rewards for reviews.

[Descent]

Going to make this nice and big, since you people never seem to get it(Yes, talking about you, Tigress and other Ymir zealots)....

Just because a review isn't a 100/100 of your precious server, doesn't mean it is fake. If a user had a bad time on your server, that's their personal experience and opinion. Nobody said you had to like it, and the guidelines sure as hell don't state that all reviews of YmirRO have to go through Tigress, first.

Now get off of your high horses and stop trashing this topic.

And Omi, keep it up and you're going to be sporting a variety of dots, it seems like every post is a derailment attempt lately.

[Sarin]

Question: the server offered rewards for rewiews, screenie was posted by devilsnevercry a few posts above. It is dated May 24th 2009, did server actually got delisted because of that?

[Head Monocle of DOOM]

It is not a write a review get a prize. please read the whole post it's an activity contest. basically if you were earnest about attempting to get more players you would have a chance to get a prize. There was more to it than just reviews, in fact you could not write a review at all and still get the prize.

Asside from that this review despite the fact I dont agree with it is nicely written and the author has a right to his opinion. I would rather read reviews like this then those freakkng text blocks people make hailing how amazing a server is. Seriously this reviews format should be a template for all reviews made here. it's very well organized and I can easilly process the information.

Furthermore OMG Descent's a mod! I have been away from here for a while. Last time I was here descent had a couple of those dot's he's threatening Omi with.

[SilverStream~]

So what you're saying is that there is an incentive to get prizes if you write a review.

Which is.. against the rules.




And, Hi doom.

[Head Monocle of DOOM]

I'm saying that because it's technical activity it is factored into a possibility of getting a prize. Therefore not technically a get a prize for reviewing. I could rewirte my review's here and elsewhere ten fold but that doesn't make me an active member of YmirRO I got that disease called Full Time Job.

and hello SilverStream

[SilverStream~]

It will still be an incentive to be given prizes for writing reviews.  In an arguement/discussion about it will still be an incentive to get prizes for writing reviews.

They should be de-listed.

[Orange]

I'm saying that because it's technical activity

hey guise doing willpower event, whoever can spend the most time making accounts and reviewing gets prize lol k

[Descent]

Question: the server offered rewards for rewiews, screenie was posted by devilsnevercry a few posts above. It is dated May 24th 2009, did server actually got delisted because of that?

As far as I can remember, they've always stuck within guidelines. "Most active player" =/= "review us for points!!!".