Sylvanas RO Fake Score Review

Started by Akinari, Jun 13, 2009, 05:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Akinari


LemonCrosswalk

Were you the guy that posted the 29? There are thousands of false 100 scoring reviews. It seems odd you only pick one.

YouRO

Yeah, im a witness of that too.
I saw 100 Scoring Reviews from SylvanasRO, most likely all bribed, or just multiple accounts.

[GM] Xenon
YouRO | It's all about you!

YouRO IS HIRING! If you would like a spot on YouRO, PM me via eAthena, or MSN, [email][email protected][/email].

yC

#3
what all bribed? there are just 2 as of right now, 29 and 100.

anyway as i answered before, server owner are allowed to write ONE review just like anybody else.  there are tons of server that have one 100/100 review and nothing else.  we will apply the review guidelines to each of them, unless we find them writing multiple which will be a violation to the ToS.

Now ... to apply the review guidelines.

The 100/100 review needs to be deleted because "you must have played the server to review it".  "The server is looking pretty promising so far. Though it hasn't opened yet, there is a lot of forum activity."  Pretty much gave it away.

The 29/100 .. seems to be a little too cruel as it was made within 8 hours of server launching (actually that's my opinion and does not represent any guidelines).  A prediction of "the WoE competition is going to be horrible" resulted all game-play section scores to 1 isn't exactly reasonable.  "SylvanisRO is just a bad MastelaRO remake. Don't bother."  might be someone from the old MastelaRO server?  that could fall into mention of other server names (depend on usage) under the review guideline.

Anyway, i'll just delete both so it can all start new.


Akinari

Quote from: LemonCrosswalk on Jun 13, 2009, 01:03 PM
Were you the guy that posted the 29? There are thousands of false 100 scoring reviews. It seems odd you only pick one.

I occasionally see the very bad scores and see what the rest of the server has for reviews.  Nothing personal against them, just seemed bogus.