Invalid information in Review

[phuman1992]

http://ratemyserver.net/index.php?page=serverstat&serid=13041&itv=6&url_sname=Regal%20Ragnarok%20Online&page_num=1

The review by Kayden says he played the server for 6 months. But the server has only been open for um...4 days, lol. So I dont think this review can count as a legitimate review since he lied about how long he has played on the server. Also the reboots are expected seeing how the server has only been opened, the GM's have to restart whether to fix minor bugs, or add new things.  The screenshot that was provided by him was taken out of context. The specialty jurs were removed to help with the economy actually all 4 slot weps were removed from the mall. I dont know this guy has been biased on both the HR server and now the MR server.


Edit fixed a spelling mistake lol

[yC]

As far as I know, the listing is created by the same owner as http://ratemyserver.net/index.php?page=detailedlistserver&serid=11345

I think they dropped their rate (wipe or not unknown) and created a new listing?  I can't say how long this server had opened given the situation, those played previously could just add up the time they were there.  I have no reason to doubt them.

[phuman1992]

The server is in fact 100% new. I just find it odd that he put 6 months of playing. Even if he did play the high rate that shouldnt count as time for the mid rate server. Maybe you can edit it so it says 1 month instead of the 6.

[yC]

I can't stop any new reviewer doing the same just because they played the previous server.  Might as well leave it the way it is, since they are not exactly lying.