False Review (AeriaRO)

[Camui]

Rundown:
A user gets caught botting and is warned (bad decision on my part).
User bots again and has all accounts banned.

Friend gets angry and writes false review.

Evidence: http://www.aeriaro.com/main/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=6&thread_id=318

According to her logic:
Whether it be botting or talking smack, all punishment should be of the same degree.

Bargaining: http://camui.radical-dreamers.org/reports/evidence01.png


Thread: http://camui.radical-dreamers.org/reports/forumpost_evidence.png


Review:
http://ratemyserver.net/index.php?page=serverstat&serid=3316&url_sname=Aeria%20Ragnarok%20Online&page_num=1

Thank you for your time.

[Kevin_]

I am a current support/event GM of AeriaRO, and Fruitystar's Server Rating has been made out of hate.

I know for a fact that our GM staff is available most of the entire day, and we do our part in helping the community. Also, there is a reason to why there has not been any events in the server. I am mainly the one who starts an event, but due to the fact that I have classes, and that I  want to be out with my real life friends, I have not been able to do an event these past couple of days. Also he/she had a review that gave the server positive ratings, but unfortunately I do not have the proof for that.

[Mewi]

While I can see her point of view, I do not agree with it.  This user Izumi Curtis was banned for botting.  I'd know because Camui was boasting how I didn't catch it before he did lol.  Anyway,  the rules are pretty clear on most servers,  botters = perma banned.  Why should we grant warnings to such players who can't even play the game?  Why should we allow them to keep botted characters and items?

[yC]

please check your pm.

I deleted the review based on your pm reply.

However, I think that player is not that bad.  Did you ban the IP of his/her friend's so the friend can't play again?  If so, maybe you do want to give the botter a chance to start a new account.  (If he/she is willing to start all over again.)

[Camui]

Whether she be a decent player or not, her friend was caught botting and should pay the price.

Botters shouldn't be granted a second chance (due to illegitimately obtained items), in this case a second chance was given but not appreciated.

EDIT: I did not IP ban.

[FruityStar]

Ohh =( its not a false review.

Yes I was angry and I did consider makin a bazillion accounts to bash aeria, but in the end I didnt and just wrote the truth :O.. I'm sorry if you guys thought it was false.

I've rewritten a fourth review :O I hope everyone is happy now ! If it gets taken out again for "false" review, then I really hope we reconsider our evaluation system. Positive = Truth / Negative = False or Truth = Truth / False = False =3!

@Camui:
The bargain post was very desperate and sad on my part, but I only did it because I was given false hope from the last banning incident. :O I was told that half of the server threaten to leave if something wasn't done and you took that into account. Thats why I thought I'd try to bargain too, I may not be a real life friend or Old Aeria Regular or so popular that half the server would be affected, but I thought if "half of the server" could bargain, I could try too >_<! It would have been easier if you just said no instead of lecturing me on other stuff~ u_u but still my bad. I'm sorry D:!

@Kevin:
Yup, Kevin was the one who did fun events, but this past month I haven't seen much events and I am online alot so thats why I gave the events part a low rating D:.

[yC]

I am sorry FruityStar.  It wasn't because we believe the review is true or false that we deleted your review.  If a review does not break any review guidelines, we let the reader to decide if it's true or false.  It is too hard to tell true or false on the internet and RMS really can't be the only judge you know.

However, by our standard, server owner has the right to forbidden an "identified" user to write review on his/her server.  There are even cases where server owner feel a review is false with a score 100/100 that does not reflect the status of the server.  And the server owner "identified" the user then we delete the review.  In your case, it's the same.

The rule is there to work against someone that is known to the server owner that is targeting his/her server.

[Camui]

@Camui:
The bargain post was very desperate and sad on my part, but I only did it because I was given false hope from the last banning incident. :O I was told that half of the server threaten to leave if something wasn't done and you took that into account. Thats why I thought I'd try to bargain too, I may not be a real life friend or Old Aeria Regular or so popular that half the server would be affected, but I thought if "half of the server" could bargain, I could try too >_<! It would have been easier if you just said no instead of lecturing me on other stuff~ u_u but still my bad. I'm sorry D:!

Instead of making AeriaRO look bad out of spite, how about you get a life?

You justify your low rating with "lack of events." Lol? How about some evidence?
NEWS FLASH! According to FruityStar, a lack of events = 4 for a stability rating.

Me lecturing you? Don't make me laugh. You were the one pushing me for an unban. I was simply explaining the difference between using a third party program (Event 2) and using vulgar language (Event 1). I fail to see a reason why I should explain the differences between the two AGAIN.

Anyhoo, I got what I wanted so I am leaving this thread. ::zug zug::