As an outsider looking at this thread over the months, you really damaged your image and reputation here. Really as an (attempted) server owner, you can "say whatever you want", but that doesn't change the fact that people will see this and think you're f*** crazy.
I wouldn't go 100ft near your server, and hell I read up about SorinRO and it seemed interesting.
You've gone after Sarah server like a rabid beast out for blood, and it never really seems like there's an actual reason other than the fact you had a failing server. So everything you said looked like a torrent of salt and jealousy.
PR is pretty important. It's ironic to make such an donkey of yourself and yet attack the owner of SS based on his past actions as well. I wouldn't trust someone with anger issues anymore than i'd trust someone who had a past history of shutting down servers. There are plenty, pleenty of owners over the years who ragequit their servers or destroyed them.
Food for thought.
I think I played Sarah Server around launch but got distracted by some shiny things elsewhere. So I have absolutely no ties to the server. Just had to throw in my two cents.
Sure, there are people who have ragequit and destroyed their own server, but you fail to acknowledge the reason why. There was not a lot of work put into the server to begin with, so the person doesn't feel like they are losing much. You are making huge logical leaps in your argument by saying any person who gets mad will also act in a destructive manner, as if anger itself is inherently destructive. It can be caused for a very sensible reason and is not hard to act sensibly out of. Already by associating the creation with the creator, you are making a giant logical fallacy for you are completely refusing to acknowledge the possibility that someone could do something right without knowing why it's right(by accident).
Public reputation is not as important as you think. Anybody can say anything about someone who knows exactly what they're talking about and it's not going to change a damn thing. If society wants
the world to be revolved around people portraying false images and invest into that instead of substance, then I guess that's on you for making a point out of it
That being said, this whole shtick I'm saying doesn't defend Neffletics for what he doesn't deserve to be defended for since it's clear that there are things here which he has done wrong, but if you want to criticize someone do it for something real
. I'm so sick of hearing these superficial, bland arguments which are completely insignificant. You guys wonder why I come out and trash on you all of the time, but you don't really