RateMyServer Ragnarok Community

Ragnarok Online => Job Discussion => Archer => Topic started by: Cloudrunner on May 27, 2007, 09:51 PM

Title: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Cloudrunner on May 27, 2007, 09:51 PM
Can anyone explain to me exactly what reduces the hunter/sniper bird's damage with blitz beat/auto-blitz? It specifically says its not modified by size or family damage modifying cards, but I'm not entirely sure thats true. What I want to know is if the bird's damage is reduced by the following things:

Demihuman resitance cards,
Demihuman resitance items(poopoo),
Neutral damage resitance cards(raydric),
ranged damage resistance cards(alligator),
ranged damage resitance items (ummm...long mace I think?)
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Kurogasa on May 27, 2007, 11:43 PM
the answer to all is yes. The thing that says its not modified means that hydras or skel workers dont effect it.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Pandora on May 28, 2007, 08:58 AM
It pierces defense, so what doesnt reduce it is def, the rest is all good I think.

As Kurogasa said, the hunter itself cannot up his damage with hydra card, blitz damage is only dependant on the hunter's int as far as I know.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Cloudrunner on May 28, 2007, 08:57 PM
So it can be reduced by demihuman cards, but it can't be increased by demihuman cards.  Wow, thats incredibly gay.  It kinda makes trying any build but a double strafe spammer a little pointless.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: BaNiSHeDHeLL on May 28, 2007, 09:08 PM
Quote from: Cloudrunner on May 28, 2007, 08:57 PM
So it can be reduced by demihuman cards, but it can't be increased by demihuman cards.  Wow, thats incredibly gay.  It kinda makes trying any build but a double strafe spammer a little pointless.

What they're trying to say is FA & Blitz Beat are pretty much neutral spells.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Glenn on May 29, 2007, 08:12 AM
Falcon is pretty weak in pvp, but its great for pvm. You can easily solo almost all mvps with a FA.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: BaNiSHeDHeLL on May 29, 2007, 08:19 AM
notrly.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Glenn on May 29, 2007, 08:58 AM
Uhh yes rly, I have a pure FA on a 90/70. I can't kill s*** in pvp, but I can kill neerly any mvp.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Pandora on May 29, 2007, 09:33 AM
FA is pretty powerful, in pvp its not that great but not that bad either, compares to glora domini sorta.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: BaNiSHeDHeLL on May 29, 2007, 11:09 PM
Quote from: Glenn on May 29, 2007, 08:58 AM
Uhh yes rly, I have a pure FA on a 90/70. I can't kill s*** in pvp, but I can kill neerly any mvp.

Well, it's obvious you fail.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Emeralda on Jun 01, 2007, 02:25 PM
FA can be elemental. Since you don't need a bow to use it, get an elemental dagger.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Glenn on Jun 01, 2007, 02:45 PM
That doesn't make it 'elemental' exactly. It will 'bypass raydric', but not make it the element. (ie. Fire damascus wont allow your falcon to hit ghost) At least it goes through Pally's Defending Aura. >_>
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: BaNiSHeDHeLL on Jun 01, 2007, 03:13 PM
Quote from: Glenn on Jun 01, 2007, 02:45 PM
That doesn't make it 'elemental' exactly. It will 'bypass raydric', but not make it the element. (ie. Fire damascus wont allow your falcon to hit ghost) At least it goes through Pally's Defending Aura. >_>


Yeah, atleast.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Cloudrunner on Jun 01, 2007, 04:41 PM
Quote from: Emeralda on Jun 01, 2007, 02:25 PM
FA can be elemental. Since you don't need a bow to use it, get an elemental dagger.

Does that apply to blitz beat as well?
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: Glenn on Jun 03, 2007, 01:19 AM
See my previous post, it works the same way. As in not making it elemental.. but allowing it to bypass raydic.

@BaNiSHeDHeLL: I don't know if you were trying to 'flame' me by saying 'atleast', but it IS two words.
Title: Re: Blitz beat damage
Post by: BaNiSHeDHeLL on Jun 03, 2007, 06:57 PM
@Glenn

I meant it as atleast it can do any damage on a paladin. If you call "Yeah, atleast." a flame you don't really know what you're talking about . Sorry dude. :X